Acute effects of hibiscus tea versus coffee consumption before prolonged sitting on blood pressure and heart rate variability in adults: a randomized crossover trial.

Eur J NutrNov 6, 2026 (epub)

Hadeel Almalki, Muhanad Aljberee, Sarah Marzouq Alotaibi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized crossover trial compared acute cardiovascular responses to hibiscus tea versus coffee before 3 hours of uninterrupted sitting in 24 young, healthy adults. Compared with coffee, hibiscus tea was associated with lower systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (β = - 4.2, - 3.3, - 3.6 mmHg, respectively) and higher lnHF (β = 0.3); all differences had p < 0.05. No other heart rate variability indices differed significantly. The findings suggest a possible short-term advantage for hibiscus tea during prolonged sitting, but do not establish long-term effects.

Key findings

  • Compared with coffee, hibiscus tea was associated with lower systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (β = - 4.2, - 3.3, - 3.6 mmHg, respectively; p < 0.05 for all).
  • lnHF was higher after hibiscus tea than coffee (β = 0.3; p < 0.05), while no other HRV indices differed significantly.
  • Subgroup analyses suggested possible variation by sex and BMI, but formal interaction tests were not performed.

Why it matters

Blood pressure and autonomic responses during prolonged sitting are relevant to cardiovascular health. This small acute comparison suggests beverage choice may influence these measures during a sitting period, while the absence of differences in other HRV indices and the lack of long-term outcomes limit conclusions about broader health effects.

What to keep in mind

The trial included 24 young, healthy adults and assessed acute responses during a 3-hour sitting session; long-term implications are unknown. Subgroup findings are uncertain because formal interaction tests were not performed.

Source

Published in Eur J Nutr. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.