Toxoplasma gondii in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Infection Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors in Humans and Animals.

Vet Med SciNov 1, 2026

Ambachew Motbaynor Wubaye, Birhanu Feleke Shitu, Amare Mebrat Delie et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis estimated Toxoplasma gondii prevalence and associated risk factors in humans and ruminants in Ethiopia, using studies published between 2012 and 2025. Pooled prevalence was 42.0% (95% CI: 35.0%-49.0%) in ruminants and 61.0% (95% CI: 49.0%-74.0%) in humans. Female and adult animals had higher odds of infection or exposure than males and young animals, respectively. In humans, rural residence and cat ownership were associated with seropositivity. The findings indicate substantial reported prevalence across both populations.

Key findings

  • Pooled T. gondii prevalence was 42.0% (95% CI: 35.0%-49.0%) in ruminants and 61.0% (95% CI: 49.0%-74.0%) in humans.
  • Female animals had higher odds than males (OR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.56-2.00), as did adult versus young animals (OR = 2.39; 95% CI: 2.10-2.74).
  • Human seropositivity was associated with rural residence (OR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.07-1.42) and cat ownership (OR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.79-2.32).

Why it matters

The pooled estimates suggest that T. gondii exposure is common in both human and ruminant populations in Ethiopia. The reported associations identify population and animal characteristics that may help frame surveillance and prevention efforts. Because the review combines evidence from multiple studies, its estimates provide a broader summary than any single study, while remaining dependent on the underlying evidence.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not report the number or quality of included studies, and the pooled estimates showed heterogeneity assessment was performed but do not provide its results.

Source

Published in Vet Med Sci. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Infectious Diseases

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.