Clinical, neuroimaging and electroencephalographic differences between pediatric and adult HaNDL: a systematic review and pooled individual patient analysis.

Neurol SciNov 3, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchNeurologyPediatricsRadiology (Diagnostic)Open access

Gonçalo Cabral, Maria Brás Monteiro, Miguel Viana Baptista

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review and pooled individual patient analysis compared clinical and ancillary findings in pediatric and adult patients with HaNDL, a self-limited headache syndrome with cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis. It included 194 published cases: 159 adults and 35 children. Most clinical, cerebrospinal fluid, neuroimaging, and electroencephalographic features were similar across age groups. Optic disc edema was more frequent in pediatric patients (43.8% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.002); pediatric patients were also more often male (66.7% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.016).

Key findings

  • Optic disc edema was more frequent in pediatric than adult patients (43.8% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.002).
  • The proportion of males was higher among pediatric patients (66.7% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.016).
  • Most clinical, cerebrospinal fluid, neuroimaging, and electroencephalographic findings were comparable between age groups.
  • Altered mental status was reported more often in pediatric patients, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Why it matters

The broadly shared presentation supports viewing HaNDL as one syndrome across the lifespan, while age-associated features may help clinicians recognize it. In children, optic disc edema and possible altered mental status are relevant to assessment, but HaNDL remains a diagnosis of exclusion and high-risk alternatives should be reasonably excluded.

What to keep in mind

The analysis pooled published cases, so its findings depend on available case reports and records; the pediatric group was smaller than the adult group.

Source

Published in Neurol Sci. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.