Circulating biomarkers linking heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Toward an integrated biological framework - A systematic review.

Biomed PharmacotherOct 31, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyPulmonology

Luiza-Elena Corneanu, Ovidiu Rusalim Petriş, Victoriţa Şorodoc et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review examined circulating biomarkers studied in both heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), assessing their diagnostic, prognostic, and pathophysiological relevance. The review included 23 eligible studies published between 2015 and 2026. Natriuretic peptides, especially N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, were the most extensively investigated for identifying cardiac dysfunction and predicting adverse outcomes. Other biomarker groups—including cardiac troponins, inflammatory mediators, fibrosis- and remodelling-related markers, endothelial markers, and metabolic biomarkers—offered complementary information about disease pathways. The authors identify a rationale for evaluating multimarker approaches, while noting that further investigation is needed.

Key findings

  • The systematic review included 23 eligible studies published between 2015 and 2026.
  • Natriuretic peptides, particularly N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, were most extensively studied for cardiac dysfunction and adverse-outcome prediction.
  • Troponins, inflammatory, fibrosis/remodelling, endothelial, and metabolic biomarkers reflected complementary biological pathways.

Why it matters

HF and COPD commonly coexist, yet biomarkers have often been interpreted within disease-specific frameworks. Considering shared and complementary biomarker signals may help clarify the biological processes accompanying their coexistence and inform future cardiopulmonary risk-stratification research. The review supports investigation of combined biomarker approaches, but does not establish their clinical performance or utility.

What to keep in mind

The review synthesizes a limited and heterogeneous evidence base of 23 studies; the abstract does not report pooled estimates or establish the clinical utility of multimarker approaches.

Source

Published in Biomed Pharmacother. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.