Early functional deterioration during first-line ICI-based therapy in advanced NSCLC: implications for supportive care.

Support Care CancerOct 31, 2026 (epub)

Christiana Lekka, Nikolaos Chynkiamis, Angelos Vontetsianos et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This secondary exploratory analysis of prospectively collected data from a randomized pulmonary rehabilitation trial assessed early functional change in 42 people receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor–based therapy for advanced NSCLC. At 8 weeks, 29/42 participants (69.0%) had deteriorated in at least one of three objective domains—quadriceps force, SPPB, or 6MWD—even though ECOG performance status remained stable. Deterioration rates varied across measures and agreement between them was low. The analysis found no significant adjusted baseline associations, and the numerically less favorable subsequent PFS among those with deterioration was not statistically significant.

Key findings

  • At 8 weeks, 29/42 participants (69.0%) had deterioration in at least one functional domain despite stable ECOG performance status.
  • Deterioration affected quadriceps force in 23 (54.8%), SPPB in 14 (33.3%), and 6MWD in 5 (11.9%).
  • Deterioration frequencies differed across measures (Cochran's Q=16.76, p<0.001), with low pairwise agreement.
  • Deterioration was associated with numerically less favorable subsequent PFS, but the association was not statistically significant.

Why it matters

Stable ECOG performance status may not capture early changes across distinct aspects of physical function during ICI-based therapy. The differing deterioration rates and low agreement between measures suggest that a single functional measure may miss emerging vulnerability. Objective, complementary assessments could therefore inform supportive-care evaluation, although this analysis does not establish that monitoring improves outcomes.

What to keep in mind

This was a secondary exploratory analysis with 42 participants assessed at baseline and 8 weeks; the reported PFS association was not statistically significant.

Source

Published in Support Care Cancer. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.