Perspective of informal carers on a home-based physical activity programme (iLiFE) for individuals with interstitial lung disease.

Heart LungSep 2, 2026 (epub)

Bárbara Costa, João Chagas, Cátia Paixão et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This qualitative study, nested within the iLiFE randomised trial, explored informal carers’ perspectives on a home-based physical activity programme for people with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Nine carers participated; they were physically inactive, averaging 3819±1782 steps/day, and reported poor or unsatisfactory quality of life across measured domains. Thematic analysis suggested carers perceived improvements in their own well-being and couple relationships, as well as in patients’ health, with reduced caregiving burden. Carers valued support from health professionals and expressed interest in a longer programme, although patient fatigue was a challenge.

Key findings

  • Nine carers participated and averaged 3819±1782 steps/day.
  • Carers described perceived improvements in well-being and couple relationships, alongside better patient health and reduced caregiving burden.
  • Participants valued health-professional support and wanted the programme to continue for longer, despite patient fatigue.

Why it matters

Informal carers have a central role in ILD management, yet their perspectives on physical activity programmes are not well studied. These interviews suggest that a programme aimed at patients may also be perceived as beneficial to carers and relationships, while highlighting support needs and fatigue as relevant considerations when designing home-based interventions.

What to keep in mind

The findings are based on interviews with nine carers and reflect perceived impacts; they do not establish that the programme caused changes in carers’ well-being or burden.

Source

Published in Heart Lung. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pulmonology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.