PURE PRIME: implementing Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Primary care - a randomized-controlled feasibility trial.

Ann Am Thorac SocNov 1, 2026

Jessica A Walsh, Marita T Dale, Zoe J McKeough et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

PURE PRIME was a randomized controlled feasibility trial testing pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in private physiotherapy or exercise physiology practices for people with chronic respiratory disease. Participants were assigned to an 8-week, twice-weekly program or usual care. Of those randomized to the intervention group, 75% completed the program. Among participants who undertook PR, outcomes improved from baseline, including incremental shuttle walk distance (mean difference, 53.7; 95% CI, 37.8-69.6 meters). The authors concluded that delivery in private practices was feasible and safe, although some control-group participants also received the intervention because of trial logistics.

Key findings

  • Of participants randomized to PR, 75% completed the intervention.
  • Among those undertaking PR, incremental shuttle walk test performance improved by a mean 53.7 meters (95% CI, 37.8-69.6).
  • Within-group changes included 4.7 more repetitions on the 1-minute sit-to-stand test (95% CI, 3.3-6.0) and improved St George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores (mean difference, -7.38; 95% CI, -12.23 to -2.54).
  • One minor study-related adverse event occurred.

Why it matters

Access to pulmonary rehabilitation is limited, and private physiotherapy and exercise physiology practices may offer an additional setting for delivery. This feasibility trial found substantial completion and improvements in exercise capacity and patient-reported outcomes among participants who undertook the program, with one minor study-related adverse event. These findings support further consideration of community-based delivery while not establishing comparative effectiveness.

What to keep in mind

This was a feasibility trial, and trial logistics led some participants allocated to usual care to complete the intervention, limiting clean comparison between groups.

Source

Published in Ann Am Thorac Soc. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pulmonology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.