Presenting non-insulin-based indices of insulin resistance relevant to pre-hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Exp HypertensFeb 4, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyEndocrinology

Maryam Farahmand, Sima Nazarpour, Hanieh Malmir et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined associations between non-insulin-based insulin-resistance indices and pre-hypertension in studies using cross-sectional designs. Fifteen studies were included in the review and 14 in the meta-analysis. TyG, TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR were each associated with significantly higher odds of pre-hypertension. The diagnostic odds ratio was 2.67 (95% CI: 2.39-2.97) for TyG and 3.45 (95% CI: 2.73-4.35) for TyG-BMI. The findings indicate association, not causation.

Key findings

  • All 15 included studies were cross-sectional or used a cross-sectional approach; 14 contributed to the meta-analysis.
  • TyG was associated with pre-hypertension, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 2.67 (95% CI: 2.39-2.97).
  • TyG-BMI was associated with pre-hypertension, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 3.45 (95% CI: 2.73-4.35).
  • TyG-WC, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR were also associated with significantly increased odds of pre-hypertension (P < 0.05).

Why it matters

These findings suggest that routinely derived, non-insulin-based indices may help identify people with pre-hypertension and support earlier assessment of cardiovascular risk. However, the evidence is cross-sectional, so it cannot establish whether insulin resistance precedes pre-hypertension or causes it. Prospective research is needed before the indices’ predictive value or role in prevention can be established.

What to keep in mind

All included studies were cross-sectional or used a cross-sectional approach, preventing causal inference; the authors call for prospective and longitudinal research.

Source

Published in Clin Exp Hypertens. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.