Peptides for male sexual dysfunction: a systematic review of emerging evidence.

J Sex MedNov 6, 2026
Clinical ResearchUrologyEndocrinology

Mohamed Ramez, Mostafa M Mostafa, Hamza Mohamed et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This PRISMA-guided systematic review assessed human studies of peptide-based therapies for male sexual function, reproductive hormones, and semen parameters. Twelve studies involving 372 men evaluated melanocortin receptor agonists, kisspeptin analogues, and oxytocin. Melanocortin agonists had the most consistent evidence, with significant increases in penile rigidity and erectile duration reported in healthy men and men with erectile dysfunction, including sildenafil non-responders. Kisspeptin showed effects on gonadotropin secretion, sexual processing, tumescence, and desire, whereas oxytocin findings were mixed. The authors conclude that evidence remains limited and does not yet support routine clinical use.

Key findings

  • Twelve studies comprising 372 male participants met the review’s inclusion criteria.
  • Melanocortin receptor agonists produced significant increases in penile rigidity and erectile duration across studied groups, including sildenafil non-responders.
  • Kisspeptin increased gonadotropin secretion and was associated with improved penile tumescence and measures of sexual desire.
  • Oxytocin had mixed effects, with no consistent improvement in erectile function, ejaculation latency, or semen parameters.

Why it matters

The review suggests that peptide therapies may affect male sexual health through different erectile, central, endocrine, and relational pathways. This broadens the range of mechanisms under investigation, particularly for erectile outcomes and sexual desire. However, the findings are preliminary; distinguishing which patients may benefit and whether effects are durable requires stronger comparative evidence.

What to keep in mind

The evidence base was limited by small study samples, heterogeneous populations, short follow-up, and a lack of comparative studies.

Source

Published in J Sex Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Urology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.