The relationship between sirtuin1 gene polymorphism and coronary heart disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore)Nov 6, 2026

Xin-Yue Xing, Jing Gong, Xiao-Ying Song et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined associations between four SIRT1 gene polymorphisms and coronary heart disease (CHD), drawing on 9 articles with 1,839 cases and 1,937 controls. The rs7069102 dominant model (CC + CG > GG) was associated with lower CHD odds (odds ratio = 0.278, 95% confidence interval (0.126-0.612), P = .001), and this association remained significant after multiple-testing correction (adjusted q = 0.013). The rs4746720 dominant-model association was nominal and did not remain significant after correction; the other reported polymorphism comparisons were not associated with CHD risk.

Key findings

  • For rs7069102, the dominant model (CC + CG > GG) was associated with lower CHD odds: odds ratio = 0.278, 95% confidence interval (0.126-0.612), P = .001; adjusted q = 0.013.
  • The rs4746720 dominant model (TC + TT > CC) showed a nominal association with increased CHD risk: odds ratio = 1.321, 95% confidence interval (1.032-1.692), P = .027; adjusted q = 0.176.
  • The other reported rs7069102, rs4746720, rs7895833, and rs3818292 comparisons were not associated with CHD risk.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that SIRT1 genetic variation, particularly rs7069102, may be relevant to differences in CHD susceptibility. However, the evidence is based on a limited set of studies, and the rs4746720 result illustrates the importance of accounting for multiple comparisons. These results are hypothesis-generating rather than a basis for individual risk assessment.

What to keep in mind

The authors note that the quantity and quality of included studies were limited, and that the conclusions require verification in more high-quality studies.

Source

Published in Medicine (Baltimore). This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.