Systematic Review of Smart Home Assistive Technology Devices for Supporting People With Dementia Living in Their Homes.

Int J Geriatr PsychiatryNov 1, 2026
Clinical ResearchGeriatricsNeurology

Oscar Han, Reagan Lee, Anne Lee et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed smart home and wearable assistive technologies for people with dementia living at home or in supported accommodation. Across 18 eligible studies evaluating 17 devices, the review found level-2 evidence supporting companion robots, an electric calendar, a night-time home monitoring system, and the People Power Caregiver system. However, pooled evidence did not show reduced caregiver burden (p = 0.68; Hedges's g = 0.01; 95% CI -0.14 to 0.17). The authors judged the technologies acceptable and feasible, but concluded that evidence of efficacy remains limited.

Key findings

  • The review included 18 studies investigating 17 smart home or wearable devices for people with dementia.
  • Level-2 evidence supported companion robots, an electric calendar, a night-time home monitoring system, and the People Power Caregiver system.
  • Meta-analysis found no evidence of reduced caregiver burden (p = 0.68; Hedges's g = 0.01; 95% CI -0.14 to 0.17).
  • The review found smart home technologies acceptable and feasible, while evidence for efficacy remained limited.

Why it matters

Technology may help support safety, autonomy, and caregiving for people with dementia who remain in their homes, but feasibility and acceptability do not establish clinical benefit. The pooled result provides no evidence that the investigated devices reduce caregiver burden. Distinguishing promising device-specific evidence from the limited overall efficacy base is important when considering these technologies in dementia care.

What to keep in mind

The evidence base was limited to 18 studies, and the authors state that larger clinical trials are needed to strengthen evidence of efficacy.

Source

Published in Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Geriatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.