Interventions to Increase Organ Donation: A Systematic Review.

Clin TransplantNov 1, 2026

Shamatanni Chowdhury, Abigail H Coulter, Madeline McGinnis et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review synthesized United States-based studies of interventions intended to increase organ donation among adults. Searches identified 36 eligible studies published between 2010 and 2023: 13 randomized or cluster-randomized studies, 22 quasi-experimental studies, and one cohort study. Outcomes included registration, authorization or consent, donation rates, and donor numbers. Results were mixed, but immediate opportunities to register, interpersonal or peer engagement, staff involvement, and workflow changes were more consistently associated with improved donation-related outcomes than passive written materials or lower-intensity media interventions.

Key findings

  • The review included 36 studies: 13 randomized or cluster-randomized studies, 22 quasi-experimental studies, and one cohort study.
  • Immediate registration opportunities, interpersonal or peer engagement, staff involvement, and workflow changes were more consistently associated with increased donation-related outcomes.
  • Passive written materials and lower-intensity media interventions generally had smaller or nonsignificant effects.

Why it matters

Organ donation interventions vary in their effects on registration, consent, and donation. The review suggests that reducing practical barriers and actively engaging people may be more promising than education alone. However, mixed findings and methodological weaknesses mean that the evidence does not yet establish which approaches are scalable or effective across different populations and settings.

What to keep in mind

The included studies commonly lacked blinding or clear allocation concealment, had baseline differences or no concurrent controls, and were vulnerable to residual confounding.

Source

Published in Clin Transplant. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Preventive Medicine / Public Health

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.