Feasibility and tolerability of combining 6 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at 3.2 mA and digital cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Neurol SciNov 5, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchNeurologyGeriatrics

Brunno Freitas da Costa, Karin Reuwsaat, Nwabunwanne Emele et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized-trial study evaluated feasibility and tolerability of five daily sessions of 6-Hz, 3.2-mA transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) during digital cognitive training (DCT) in older adults with mild cognitive impairment, with exploratory comparisons against a sham group. All participants completed treatment (100% adherence); active-session side effects were mild in 67% and moderate in 23%, with no severe events. Antisaccade errors showed a group-by-time interaction favoring active stimulation (p = 0.028), while reaction time showed no stimulation-specific effect. The authors conclude that the approach was feasible and well tolerated, but efficacy findings require confirmation.

Key findings

  • All participants completed treatment, with 100% adherence.
  • During active sessions, side effects were mild in 67% and moderate in 23%; no severe events occurred.
  • Antisaccade total errors showed a group × time interaction favoring active stimulation (p = 0.028); reaction time had no stimulation-specific effect.
  • Verbal and visual memory showed time effects (p = 0.016 and p = 0.002); visuoconstructive abilities had a trend-level group × time interaction (p = 0.054).

Why it matters

Higher-intensity tACS delivered alongside cognitive training was completed by participants with mild cognitive impairment without severe reported events. The exploratory inhibitory-control result and possible transfer to selected cognitive domains provide a rationale for further evaluation, while the absence of a reaction-time effect and the need for confirmation temper conclusions about cognitive benefit.

What to keep in mind

The active group included ten participants, and efficacy analyses were exploratory. The abstract states that confirmation in the ongoing randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Source

Published in Neurol Sci. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.