Extended in vivo activity of VRC01 HIV-1 prophylaxis entails initial protective efficacy and subsequent breakthrough infections.

Sci Transl MedNov 4, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchInfectious Diseases

Allan C deCamp, Michal Juraska, Li Li et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

The two parallel randomized antibody-mediated prevention trials assessed whether intravenous VRC01 prevented HIV-1 acquisition, with this analysis extending follow-up through the week 104 final visit. Against viruses highly sensitive to VRC01 (IC 80 < 1 microgram/milliliter), cumulative prevention efficacy was 66.3% (95% confidence interval: 32.4, 83.2%). After the final dose at week 72, HIV diagnoses and resistance were more frequent in VRC01 recipients than in placebo recipients. The findings indicate activity against sensitive viruses alongside later breakthrough infections, particularly involving viruses with reduced sensitivity.

Key findings

  • Against highly VRC01-sensitive viruses (IC 80 < 1 microgram/milliliter), cumulative prevention efficacy was 66.3% (95% confidence interval: 32.4, 83.2%).
  • After week 80, more diagnoses involving moderately sensitive or resistant viruses (IC 80 ≥ 5 microgram/milliliter) occurred with VRC01 than placebo (11 versus 1).
  • In the post-week 80 period, HIV diagnosis and resistance to VRC01 were more frequent in the VRC01 groups than in placebo groups.

Why it matters

The results distinguish protection against antibody-sensitive viruses from protection against HIV acquisition overall. They also highlight that breakthrough infections and resistance may become more apparent as antibody concentrations wane, underscoring the challenge of relying on a single antibody to prevent infection across viruses with differing sensitivity.

What to keep in mind

The abstract reports efficacy against a defined sensitivity subgroup and follow-up through week 104; it does not provide overall efficacy estimates or further details on the analysis.

Source

Published in Sci Transl Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Infectious Diseases

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.