The effect of early rehabilitation nursing on the recovery of cardiac function in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

J Health Popul NutrOct 30, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyOpen access

Zhiwei Feng, Mingke Zhang, Qingzhu Qin

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective randomised controlled trial compared structured early rehabilitation nursing with routine postoperative nursing in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. The study enrolled 314 patients, allocated equally between groups, and assessed outcomes after 6 months. Compared with routine nursing, early rehabilitation nursing was associated with higher stroke volume, left ventricular ejection fraction and 6-minute walking distance, lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and lower major adverse cardiovascular event incidence; all reported between-group differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Quality-of-life scores were also higher in five domains.

Key findings

  • At 6 months, stroke volume, left ventricular ejection fraction and 6-minute walking distance were higher with early rehabilitation nursing than with routine nursing (p < 0.05).
  • Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was lower in the early rehabilitation group than in the control group (p < 0.05).
  • Major adverse cardiovascular events were less frequent with early rehabilitation nursing (p < 0.05); the abstract does not report event rates.
  • Quality-of-life scores were higher in five domains in the early rehabilitation group (p < 0.05).

Why it matters

Recovery after myocardial infarction treated with PCI involves functional capacity and cardiac measures as well as clinical events and quality of life. This trial reports improvements across these outcomes with a structured early nursing programme compared with routine care, suggesting that rehabilitation nursing may be a relevant component of post-PCI recovery. The abstract does not provide effect sizes, so the magnitude of benefit cannot be assessed.

What to keep in mind

The abstract reports statistical significance but not effect sizes or event rates, limiting assessment of the magnitude and clinical importance of the differences.

Source

Published in J Health Popul Nutr. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.