Age-specific reference values for pulse wave velocity in paediatric populations: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

J HypertensOct 9, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPediatricsCardiology

Óscar Martínez-Cifuentes, Peter M Nilsson, Alicia Saz-Lara et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled observational studies reporting pulse wave velocity (PWV) in healthy children to establish age-specific reference values. Ten studies were included. PWV followed a nonlinear age pattern: the pooled mean was 5.33 m/s at ages 0–5 years, fell to 4.93 m/s at ages 6–8 years, then rose progressively to 5.80 m/s at ages 15–18 years. The pattern was consistent across sexes. The authors identify age as the primary determinant of childhood arterial stiffness, while noting substantial between-study heterogeneity and evidence suggesting publication bias.

Key findings

  • Pooled mean PWV was 5.33 m/s at ages 0–5 years and 4.93 m/s at ages 6–8 years.
  • PWV then increased progressively, reaching 5.80 m/s at ages 15–18 years; the pattern was consistent across sexes.
  • Substantial heterogeneity was detected, and Egger's test suggested publication bias across several age groups.

Why it matters

PWV is a marker of arterial stiffness, and age-related changes during childhood mean that interpretation depends on developmental stage. Age-specific reference values may help distinguish expected variation from potentially accelerated vascular aging and support cardiovascular risk assessment in children. The reported heterogeneity and possible publication bias, however, warrant caution when applying pooled estimates.

What to keep in mind

The synthesis included only ten observational studies and found substantial between-study heterogeneity and evidence suggesting publication bias.

Source

Published in J Hypertens. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.