Cognitive performance and self-reported physical exercise in bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional analysis of pre-randomization screening data from an ongoing randomized controlled trial.

J Affect DisordOct 6, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPsychiatry

Gabriel Okawa Belizario, Fernanda Mayumi Del Mastro Espíndola, Cícera Claudinea Duarte et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This cross-sectional analysis of pre-randomization screening data from an ongoing randomized trial examined self-reported exercise and cognition in 108 euthymic adults aged 18–55 with bipolar disorder. Participants reporting structured exercise at least twice weekly had higher SCIP total scores than those reporting no exercise (64.63 ± 9.19 vs. 56.50 ± 7.84; p < 0.001, d = 0.95). The exercise group also performed better in working memory, which remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons; the verbal-learning difference did not. The observational design cannot establish that exercise caused the cognitive differences.

Key findings

  • SCIP total scores were higher in the exercise group than the no-exercise group (64.63 ± 9.19 vs. 56.50 ± 7.84; p < 0.001, d = 0.95).
  • Working-memory performance favored the exercise group (p = 0.002) and remained significant after Bonferroni correction.
  • Verbal learning favored the exercise group (p = 0.010), but this difference did not remain significant after correction.

Why it matters

Cognitive difficulties can persist in bipolar disorder and affect functioning. The observed association between regular exercise and better global cognition and working memory supports further investigation of exercise as a possible component of neurocognitive rehabilitation. Because exercise was self-reported and the analysis was cross-sectional, the findings do not show that exercise improves cognition.

What to keep in mind

Exercise was self-reported and recorded as a binary measure, without information on intensity, duration, or modality. Demographic and clinical covariates were unavailable for adjustment, and the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference.

Source

Published in J Affect Disord. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Psychiatry

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.