Cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in the non-culprit lesion predicts poor prognosis in patients with STEMI.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingSep 26, 2026 (epub)

Takumi Kondo, Takahisa Yamada, Mitsutoshi Asai et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective study assessed whether regional cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) adds prognostic information in 122 patients with STEMI. CSNA was measured using cardiac 123I-MIBG imaging, including global washout rate (WR) on planar images and regional WR in culprit and non-culprit lesions on SPECT. Over 4.2 ± 2.5 years, 34 patients experienced a major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Abnormal global WR and increased non-culprit lesion WR, but not culprit lesion WR, were independently associated with MACE after adjustment for clinical parameters and GRACE or TIMI risk scores; non-culprit findings added prognostic value to global WR.

Key findings

  • During 4.2 ± 2.5 years of follow-up, 34 patients experienced MACE.
  • Abnormal global WR and increased non-culprit lesion WR were independently associated with MACE; culprit lesion WR was not.
  • Patients with both abnormal global WR and increased non-culprit lesion WR had higher MACE risk than those with either finding (p = 0.025) or neither (p < 0.001).

Why it matters

The findings suggest that sympathetic nerve activity in myocardium outside the culprit lesion may capture prognostic information not reflected by culprit-region assessment alone. Regional SPECT measures could therefore complement global CSNA and established clinical risk scores when characterising risk after STEMI, although the study establishes prognostic association rather than benefit from acting on the imaging result.

What to keep in mind

The study was prospective but observational, with 122 patients and 34 MACE events; it does not establish that imaging-guided management improves outcomes.

Source

Published in Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.