Circulating tumor DNA and recurrence after curative-intent treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surg OncolSep 6, 2026 (epub)

Salah A Abdelrahim, Reem M Gahtani, Sameer Alqassimi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection predicts outcomes after curative-intent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. It included 12 cohort studies involving 880 patients. Preoperative ctDNA detection was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS; HR 3.34, 95% CI 1.99-5.63), while postoperative detection was associated with worse RFS (HR 4.95, 95% CI 2.77-8.83) and overall survival (OS; HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.80-5.23). Certainty was moderate for the preoperative RFS association and low for postoperative outcomes.

Key findings

  • Preoperative ctDNA detection was associated with worse RFS (HR 3.34, 95% CI 1.99-5.63; 4 studies, 291 patients; moderate certainty).
  • Postoperative ctDNA detection was associated with worse RFS (HR 4.95, 95% CI 2.77-8.83; 11 studies, 799 patients; low certainty; I 2 = 79%).
  • Postoperative ctDNA detection was associated with worse OS (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.80-5.23; 3 studies, 357 patients; low certainty).
  • Diagnostic accuracy for subsequent recurrence was modest (8 studies, 508 patients; very-low certainty).

Why it matters

The findings suggest ctDNA detection may help identify patients at higher risk of recurrence or death after curative-intent HCC treatment. However, the evidence varies across studies, and the modest diagnostic accuracy and low certainty for postoperative outcomes limit confidence in its use for individual risk assessment.

What to keep in mind

The evidence came from cohort studies and had heterogeneity, small-study effects, and risk-of-bias concerns. Studies were insufficiently comparable for assay-platform or sampling-time analyses, and prospective validation is needed.

Source

Published in Surg Oncol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.