The current state of clinical practice guidelines for women with epilepsy: a systematic review.

Epilepsy BehavSep 6, 2026 (epub)

Hyun Kyung Kim, Hye Jeong Lee, Su-Hyun Han et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review assessed the methodological quality and women-specific content of clinical practice guidelines for women with epilepsy. It included 11 guidelines developed in the United States or Europe and published between January 2014 and December 2024. The median overall quality score was 74.9% (IQR, 65.0-85.2%). Pregnancy-related topics were generally covered with specific recommendations, but guidance was limited for adolescence, catamenial epilepsy, menopause, and bone health. Recommendations also differed across guidelines, particularly on therapeutic drug monitoring during pregnancy and folic acid dosing.

Key findings

  • Across 11 guidelines, the median overall quality score was 74.9% (IQR, 65.0-85.2%).
  • Applicability scored a median 57.3% and stakeholder involvement 61.9%, the lowest-rated quality domains.
  • Adolescence (n = 3), catamenial epilepsy (n = 1), menopause (n = 2), and bone health (n = 3) received limited attention.
  • Guidelines varied most notably in recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring during pregnancy and folic acid dosing.

Why it matters

Guidelines can support care across the different life stages of women with epilepsy, but this review identifies uneven coverage beyond pregnancy and weaknesses in applicability and stakeholder involvement. These gaps may leave clinicians with less actionable guidance for important life-stage concerns, while variation in recommendations highlights areas where future guideline development could improve consistency.

What to keep in mind

The review included only 11 guidelines, all from the United States or Europe, and was restricted to guidelines published in English or Korean.

Source

Published in Epilepsy Behav. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.