Early Versus Delayed Pegcetacoplan Treatment for Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration in OAKS, DERBY, and GALE.

Am J OphthalmolAug 28, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOphthalmology

Dilsher S Dhoot, Lawrence J Singerman, Philip J Ferrone et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This analysis compared early with delayed pegcetacoplan treatment for geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration, using data from the phase 3 OAKS and DERBY trials and their open-label extension, GALE. Eyes treated continuously for 48 months were compared with eyes initially observed with sham and treated after 24 months. In the overall population, continuous treatment reduced geographic atrophy growth rate by up to 24% versus projected sham, corresponding to 1.88 mm² of retinal tissue preserved. Early treatment preserved more retinal tissue in eyes with nonsubfoveal disease; safety findings were consistent with the earlier trials.

Key findings

  • Continuous pegcetacoplan for 48 months reduced geographic atrophy growth rate by up to 24% versus projected sham, preserving 1.88 mm² of retinal tissue.
  • For nonsubfoveal disease, early monthly treatment preserved up to 3.16 mm² of retinal tissue versus 1.11 mm² with delayed treatment.
  • In the overall population, risk of progression to absolute scotoma was reduced by 32% across central 4 loci and 43% across central 16 loci.
  • GALE safety findings were consistent with those reported in OAKS and DERBY.

Why it matters

Geographic atrophy can compromise retinal tissue and visual function. These findings suggest that sustained complement inhibition may slow anatomical progression and that starting treatment earlier may preserve more retinal tissue, particularly in nonsubfoveal disease. The reported reduction in progression to absolute scotoma also provides a functional outcome relevant to the potential value of treatment over time.

What to keep in mind

The early-versus-delayed comparison used data from an open-label extension; delayed-treatment eyes crossed over from sham, and the 48-month reduction was compared with projected sham.

Source

Published in Am J Ophthalmol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Ophthalmology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.