Definition and Prediction of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The ALPHEUS-MI Study.

Can J CardiolFeb 27, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiology

Michel Zeitouni, Gilles Montalescot, Vincent Roule et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

The ALPHEUS-MI study was a prespecified analysis within a multicentre randomised trial, examining periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) and injury in 1,883 patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing elective PCI. Event rates varied substantially by definition: the trial’s primary and secondary endpoints occurred in 35.9% and 77.2%, while ARC-2/SCAI periprocedural MI occurred in 2.0%. Rates rose with accumulating patient, lesion, and procedural risk features. Across four definitions, implanted stent length greater than 60 mm was the only common correlate, with adjusted odds ratios ranging from 2.2 to 6.0.

Key findings

  • The ALPHEUS primary endpoint occurred in 35.9% and its main secondary endpoint in 77.2% of patients.
  • ARC-2/SCAI periprocedural MI occurred in 2.0%; ARC-2 significant myocardial injury occurred in 3.2%.
  • Event rates increased as high-risk patient, lesion, and procedural features accumulated.
  • Stent length greater than 60 mm was the only common correlate across definitions (adjusted odds ratios 2.2 to 6.0).

Why it matters

Periprocedural MI and myocardial injury rates depend strongly on the definition used, which is important when interpreting PCI outcomes and comparing studies. The association between longer stent length and events also highlights the relevance of coronary disease extent and procedural complexity when assessing risk, while the findings do not establish that stent length itself causes these events.

What to keep in mind

This was an analysis within a trial population, and the reported associations do not establish causation. Event rates differed substantially across endpoint definitions.

Source

Published in Can J Cardiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.