Combined B-vitamin supplementation on homocysteine and vascular outcomes in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.

Ann MedJan 30, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyOpen access

Liping Guo, Xiangfen Shi, Gaobiao Wang et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This random-effects meta-analysis assessed combined folic acid, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 supplementation in people with coronary heart disease (CHD). It included 13 studies and 14,539 participants, comparing combined supplementation with control regimens. Supplementation reduced serum homocysteine (mean difference: -2.36; 95% CI: -3.09 to -1.62; p < 0.01) and was associated with less vascular restenosis (risk ratio: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-0.95; p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in major cardiovascular events or cardiovascular-related mortality, leaving broader clinical benefit uncertain.

Key findings

  • Combined B vitamins reduced serum homocysteine versus single-nutrient regimens (mean difference: -2.36; 95% CI: -3.09 to -1.62; p < 0.01).
  • Vascular restenosis was less frequent with supplementation (risk ratio: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-0.95; p < 0.05).
  • Major cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.78).
  • Cardiovascular-related mortality was not significantly reduced (risk ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.85-1.07; p = 0.44).

Why it matters

The findings distinguish biochemical effects from patient-important outcomes: homocysteine lowering and reduced restenosis did not translate into demonstrated reductions in major cardiovascular events or cardiovascular mortality. This helps frame the evidence for combined B-vitamin supplementation in CHD and cautions against assuming that improvement in a risk marker establishes broader cardiovascular benefit.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not report study-level design details or assess variation in the included studies, limiting appraisal of the pooled estimates.

Source

Published in Ann Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.