Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors in Publicly Insured Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: A 12-month Pilot and Feasibility Study.

J Diabetes Sci TechnolSep 20, 2025 (epub)
Clinical ResearchEndocrinologyPediatricsOpen access

Sejal Shah, Molly L Tanenbaum, Alondra Loyola et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This 12-month pilot and feasibility study evaluated intermittent scanned continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use among publicly insured youth younger than 20 years with type 2 diabetes. Thirty participants were enrolled; most were Hispanic, and mean baseline HbA1c was 10.2%. CGM use declined from 50% at three months to 23% at 12 months, while wear time fell by 6.4 days per two weeks. Mean HbA1c was 9.8% at 12 months, and median time in range decreased from 71% to 42%. The findings indicate challenges in sustaining CGM use in this population.

Key findings

  • CGM use fell from 50% at three months to 23% at 12 months.
  • CGM wear time decreased by 6.4 days per two weeks by 12 months.
  • Mean HbA1c was 9.8% at 12 months; median time in range declined from 71% to 42%.
  • Youth and parents reported moderate-to-positive attitudes toward diabetes technology.

Why it matters

The study highlights that providing CGM does not ensure sustained use among publicly insured youth with type 2 diabetes. Declining wear and time in range underscore the importance of understanding practical and contextual barriers to ongoing use. The results also suggest that approaches to supporting CGM use in this group may need to differ from those used with adults with type 2 diabetes or youth with type 1 diabetes.

What to keep in mind

This was a small pilot and feasibility study, and the abstract reports no comparison group; the findings do not establish that CGM use caused changes in HbA1c or time in range.

Source

Published in J Diabetes Sci Technol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Endocrinology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.