Impact of early versus delayed mobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in small and medium-sized tears: a prospective randomized study.
Mohamed Rabie Abdallah, Ahmed Shaban Hassan, Mohamed Abdelal
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This prospective randomized study compared early with delayed mobilization after arthroscopic single-row knotless repair of small and medium full-thickness supraspinatus tears in 70 patients aged 20–70 years. Early mobilization was associated with faster range-of-motion recovery at 3 months (mean 130° vs. 115°; p = 0.02). By 12 months, pain and functional outcomes were comparable between groups. One re-tear (2.8%) occurred in the early-mobilization group, while none occurred in the delayed group; the limited events do not establish a difference in tendon integrity.
Key findings
- At 3 months, mean range of motion was 130° with early mobilization versus 115° with delayed mobilization (p = 0.02).
- At 12 months, functional and pain outcomes were comparable between mobilization groups.
- One re-tear (2.8%) occurred with early mobilization; no re-tears occurred with delayed mobilization.
Why it matters
The findings suggest that early mobilization may speed short-term motion recovery after repair, while longer-term pain and functional outcomes were similar. The re-tear counts were too limited to support a firm comparison of tendon integrity or to determine whether mobilization should differ by tear size.
What to keep in mind
The study had limited re-tear events and no prespecified tear-size subgroup analysis, preventing definitive conclusions about differential mobilization strategies by tear size.