Clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of sexual-related rectal foreign bodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Sex MedNov 6, 2026
Clinical ResearchGeneral Surgery

Feng Libo, Xia Dong, Liu Yu

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined clinical features, management, and outcomes of sexual-related rectal foreign bodies, drawing on 59 case reports, case series, and cohort studies from 22 countries, with 376 patients. Most patients were male (98.1%), and 61.4% presented more than 24 h after insertion. Transanal extraction was achieved in 73.4% of patients; overall retrieval success was 99.7%. Bowel perforation occurred in 4.7%, stoma creation in 7.2%, and mortality in 0.6%. The authors conclude that transanal extraction succeeds in most cases, with escalation-based management supported by the available evidence.

Key findings

  • Most patients were male (98.1%); autoerotic insertion accounted for 92.5% of cases.
  • Presentation occurred more than 24 h after insertion in 61.4% of patients, and 98.2% had attempted self-removal.
  • Transanal extraction was achieved in 73.4%; overall retrieval success was 99.7%.
  • Bowel perforation occurred in 4.7%, stoma creation in 7.2%, and mortality in 0.6%.

Why it matters

The review consolidates reported presentations and outcomes for a potentially urgent surgical problem. It indicates that most cases can be managed with transanal extraction, while also quantifying complications that may require escalation. These findings can inform clinical assessment and management discussions, although the evidence base consists largely of case reports and small series.

What to keep in mind

The evidence comprised case reports, case series, and only four cohort studies; meta-analytic estimates showed substantial heterogeneity for transanal extraction (I2 = 72.5%).

Source

Published in J Sex Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in General Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.