Validity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria for paediatric primary APS: inputs from a systematic literature review.

Rheumatology (Oxford)Nov 4, 2026
Clinical ResearchRheumatologyPediatrics

Stefano Romano, Edoardo Marrani, Valerio Maniscalco et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic literature review and individual participant data-style random-effects meta-analysis assessed the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria in children with primary APS. It included 148 patients identified across 118 studies. The 2023 criteria had a pooled sensitivity of 83.1% (95% CI: 76.2-88.3), compared with 91.2% (95% CI: 85.4-95.2) for the 2006 Sapporo criteria. Most children who did not meet the 2023 criteria failed to satisfy laboratory domains, indicating that adult-derived criteria may not fully capture paediatric disease.

Key findings

  • Thrombotic events were reported in 93.2% of patients, and non-thrombotic manifestations in 56.8%.
  • Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent extra-thrombotic manifestation, occurring in 29%.
  • Sensitivity was 83.1% (95% CI: 76.2-88.3) for the 2023 criteria and 91.2% (95% CI: 85.4-95.2) for the 2006 Sapporo criteria.
  • Most patients not classified by the 2023 criteria failed to meet laboratory domains.

Why it matters

Classification criteria shape how patients are identified and grouped in research. The lower sensitivity observed with the 2023 criteria suggests that some children with primary APS may be missed, particularly because of laboratory thresholds and clinical features relevant to paediatric disease. This highlights the incomplete overlap between paediatric and adult-onset APS and the importance of evaluating criteria in the population where they are used.

What to keep in mind

The evidence was assembled from published studies rather than a prospective paediatric cohort, and the analysis included only 148 patients across 118 studies.

Source

Published in Rheumatology (Oxford). This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Rheumatology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.