Outcomes and Predictors of Sustained Response After Dose Tapering of Targeted Therapies in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review.

Am J Clin DermatolOct 14, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchDermatologyOpen access

Marina Mordehachvili Burlá, Lyria de Oliveira Rosa, Beatriz Ximenes Mendes et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review examined dose tapering or withdrawal of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), including 19 studies and 4375 patients. Sustained response after tapering varied substantially by therapy: 0-60% for abrocitinib, 45-61% for baricitinib, 30-100% for dupilumab, 67-82% for lebrikizumab, 25-50% for tralokinumab, and 47-61% for upadacitinib. Lower baseline disease activity and early clinical improvement were frequently associated with durable control. The review concluded that tapering appeared to preserve efficacy more often than abrupt withdrawal in selected patients with stable disease.

Key findings

  • Sustained response rates after tapering ranged from 0-60% for abrocitinib to 67-82% for lebrikizumab, with substantial variation across therapies.
  • Lower baseline disease activity and early clinical improvement were frequently identified as potential predictors of sustained control.
  • Upadacitinib was associated with higher relapse rates after withdrawal.
  • For tralokinumab, stability across multiple visits predicted durability better than a single-time-point assessment.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that dose reduction may be feasible for some patients whose AD is stably controlled, but outcomes differ by drug and patient characteristics. Recognizing potential predictors may help frame discussions about tapering and monitoring, while the wide range of response rates underscores that durable control after dose reduction cannot be assumed.

What to keep in mind

The review included studies with varying designs and outcome definitions, and response rates differed widely. The authors note that longer prospective studies are needed.

Source

Published in Am J Clin Dermatol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Dermatology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.