Chromosomal and genetic anomalies in fetuses with nuchal translucency between 3.0 and 3.4 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acta Obstet Gynecol ScandAug 19, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchObstetrics & GynecologyMedical GeneticsOpen access

Arianna Carta, Lorenza Della Valle, Giuseppe Rizzo et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis assessed chromosomal and genetic findings in fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) of 3.0–3.4 mm and the potential added yield of invasive testing over cfDNA. Seventeen studies included 7007 fetuses. Chromosomal anomalies were identified in 13.1% (95% CI 9.3-17.3); among fetuses with isolated NT in this range, the pooled rate was 12.4% (95% CI 7.9-17.7). Pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants were reported in 2.5% (95% CI 1.3-3.9).

Key findings

  • Chromosomal anomalies occurred in 13.1% (95% CI 9.3-17.3) of fetuses with NT of 3.0–3.4 mm.
  • For isolated NT of 3.0–3.4 mm, the pooled rate of chromosomal anomalies was 12.4% (95% CI 7.9-17.7).
  • Pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants were found in 2.5% (95% CI 1.3-3.9).
  • Single-gene disorders detected by NGS/WES were reported in 5.7% (95% CI 3.3-8) of cases.

Why it matters

These pooled estimates show that a modestly increased NT measurement can be associated with a range of chromosomal and genetic findings, including variants beyond common trisomies. The results help frame counselling about the scope of genetic findings and the potential limits of cfDNA screening, while the estimates should be interpreted in light of the included studies and testing approaches.

What to keep in mind

The estimates combine studies with differing assessment methods and populations; the abstract does not provide further detail on heterogeneity or study quality.

Source

Published in Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.