Systematic review of five-year outcomes after one-anastomosis gastric bypass.

Surg Obes Relat DisJun 15, 2026 (epub)

Sergi Sanchez-Cordero, Ruth Lopez-Gonzalez, Rodrigo Hermoza et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review assessed five-year outcomes after primary one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in adults with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m². Seven studies contributed baseline data for 5524 patients, with complete five-year follow-up for 3735. The weighted mean total weight loss at five years was 33.2%; reported remission of type 2 diabetes was 77.4%. Complications included marginal ulcers, reflux, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia, with no procedure-related mortality reported. The authors judged the evidence limited and heterogeneous, leaving long-term safety and comparisons with other bariatric procedures uncertain.

Key findings

  • At five years, mean total weight loss was 33.2%, mean excess weight loss was 74.2%, and mean BMI was 30.1 kg/m².
  • Reported five-year remission rates were 77.4% for type 2 diabetes, 58.0% for hypertension, 71.9% for dyslipidemia, and 86.6% for obstructive sleep apnea.
  • Complications included marginal ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia; incidence varied, and only a minority required revisional surgery.
  • No procedure-related mortality was observed in the included studies.

Why it matters

The review brings together reported five-year weight and metabolic outcomes, while highlighting that these results do not settle questions about longer-term nutritional and reflux-related safety. The evidence also does not establish whether OAGB is superior or equivalent to other malabsorptive procedures, so the findings should be interpreted as descriptive rather than definitive comparative evidence.

What to keep in mind

Only seven studies met inclusion criteria, and the authors describe the evidence as limited, heterogeneous, and sometimes conflicting. Long-term safety, particularly nutritional deficiencies and bile reflux, remains insufficiently characterized.

Source

Published in Surg Obes Relat Dis. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in General Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.