Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Women With Endometrial Carcinoma With Myometrial Invasion: Pooled Estimates of Response From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Minim Invasive GynecolJul 10, 2026 (epub)

Antonio Raffone, Daniele Neola, Francesco Viciglione et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled outcomes of fertility-sparing conservative treatment for endometrial carcinoma with myometrial invasion. It included three retrospective observational cohort studies involving 39 women with invasion <50%. The pooled complete response rate was 82% (95% CI: 66%-94%), while recurrence was 37% (95% CI: 11%-66%). The authors noted that recurrence was slightly higher than reported for endometrial carcinoma without myometrial invasion. They concluded that this approach is not currently standard care and merits prospective evaluation in carefully selected patients receiving intensive surveillance.

Key findings

  • Pooled complete response was 82% (95% CI: 66%-94%) among women with myometrial invasion <50%.
  • Pooled recurrence was 37% (95% CI: 11%-66%), slightly higher than reported for disease without myometrial invasion.
  • Pooled rates were 3% (95% CI: 0%-14%) for partial response, 13% (95% CI: 3%-27%) for stable disease, and 0% (95% CI: 0%-4%) for progressive disease.

Why it matters

These pooled estimates describe response and recurrence after fertility-sparing treatment in a group for whom evidence is limited. The substantial recurrence estimate is relevant when weighing conservative management and underscores the importance of careful selection and surveillance. The findings provide a basis for prospective evaluation but do not establish comparative effectiveness or routine suitability.

What to keep in mind

Evidence came from only three retrospective observational cohorts, comprising 39 women; the pooled estimates therefore rest on a small, nonrandomised evidence base.

Source

Published in J Minim Invasive Gynecol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.