Digital Workflow Integration in Acute Panfacial Fracture Management.

J Oral Maxillofac SurgJun 2, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPlastic Surgery

Michael V Joachim, Michael Miloro

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review assessed digital workflows—including virtual surgical planning, three-dimensional printing, and intraoperative navigation—for acute primary panfacial or complex multiregion facial fractures in adults. Five studies involving 82 subjects were included; heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis, so results were synthesized narratively. Intraoperative navigation was associated with a statistically significant reduction in mean operative time of 124.8 minutes (36.1% reduction; 95% CI, 68.5 to 181.2 minutes, P < .001). Integrated workflows also achieved reported reduction accuracy below the 2 mm threshold in the sole strictly panfacial cohort. Evidence quality varied from moderate to very low.

Key findings

  • Intraoperative navigation reduced mean operative time by 124.8 minutes (36.1% reduction; 95% CI, 68.5 to 181.2 minutes, P < .001).
  • In the only strictly panfacial cohort, integrated VSP and navigation achieved reduction accuracy below 2 mm across all facial thirds.
  • In-house workflows had planning intervals from a mean of 4.2 hours to within 24 hours of CT acquisition, at approximately $597 USD per case.
  • Evidence quality was moderate for operative time in one study, low for reduction accuracy and occlusal outcomes, and very low for the ballistic case series.

Why it matters

Acute panfacial fracture repair is technically demanding, and delays can constrain the use of digital planning and manufacturing. The review suggests that point-of-care workflows can be implemented within acute-care timelines and may improve operative efficiency and support accurate reduction. However, the small evidence base and variable certainty mean these findings are best viewed as promising rather than definitive.

What to keep in mind

Only five studies with 82 subjects were included, and substantial heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Evidence quality ranged from moderate to very low, limiting confidence in several outcomes.

Source

Published in J Oral Maxillofac Surg. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Plastic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.