Impact of Availability of Computer-Aided Detection Devices on Adenoma Detection During Colonoscopy: A Cluster Randomized Study.

GastroenterologyJun 5, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchGastroenterology

Jason A Dominitz, Andrew J Gawron, Grace B McKee et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This pragmatic, multicentre cluster-randomised quality improvement study assessed whether making computer-aided detection (CADe) devices available affected adenoma detection during colonoscopy at Veterans Health Administration facilities. Across 42 CADe and 97 control facilities, adenoma detection rate (ADR) rose from 50.7% to 54.9% at CADe sites, an absolute increase of 4.2 percentage points (95% CI, 3.48 to 4.74 percentage points); at control sites, ADR fell from 51.8% to 51.1%. In adjusted analysis, CADe availability was associated with higher odds of adenoma detection (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.28), without changes in other lesion detection or withdrawal time.

Key findings

  • ADR increased by 4.2 percentage points (95% CI, 3.48 to 4.74 percentage points), from 50.7% to 54.9%, at CADe sites.
  • At control sites, ADR decreased by 0.7 percentage points (95% CI, -1.16 to -0.28 percentage points), from 51.8% to 51.1%.
  • CADe availability was associated with higher odds of adenoma detection (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.28), but not with detection of other lesions or withdrawal-time changes.
  • Baseline endoscopist ADR quintile was not associated with the effect of CADe availability on ADR.

Why it matters

Adenoma detection is clinically relevant because endoscopists’ ADRs are inversely associated with patients’ risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer death. This pragmatic study found improved adenoma detection when CADe was available in routine practice, addressing uncertainty from real-world studies that had generally not shown benefit. Whether the observed detection increase improves cancer outcomes remains unknown.

What to keep in mind

The study did not determine effects on cancer outcomes or potential endoscopist deskilling.

Source

Published in Gastroenterology. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Gastroenterology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.