Clinical Utility of a 50% and 30% Decline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Proton Density Fat Fraction in Predicting Fibrosis Improvement in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis.

Clin Gastroenterol HepatolFeb 6, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchGastroenterology

Rohit Loomba, Peter Chen-Yang Nikhil Daniel, Youxin Wang et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This secondary analysis of a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial assessed whether MRI-PDFF declines predict histological improvement in 163 participants with biopsy-confirmed MASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis treated with pegozafermin or placebo for 24 weeks. A ≥50% relative decline in liver fat was independently associated with fibrosis improvement without worsening MASH (adjusted odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-7.19; P = .009), whereas a ≥30% decline was not. Both thresholds predicted MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis.

Key findings

  • MRI-PDFF super-response (≥50% decline) independently predicted fibrosis improvement without worsening MASH (adjusted odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-7.19; P = .009).
  • A ≥30% MRI-PDFF decline did not independently predict fibrosis improvement (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-5.16; P = .11).
  • Both MRI-PDFF response and super-response predicted MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis (P = .004 and P < .001, respectively).
  • Super-response occurred more often with pooled pegozafermin doses than placebo (57.8% vs 11.1%; P < .0001).

Why it matters

The findings suggest that the magnitude of liver-fat reduction matters when using MRI-PDFF to assess fibrosis improvement in MASH. A ≥50% decline was more informative for fibrosis regression than the commonly used ≥30% response threshold, while both thresholds were associated with MASH resolution. This distinction may help interpret imaging response as a marker of histological outcomes, although it does not establish MRI-PDFF as a substitute for biopsy.

What to keep in mind

This was a secondary analysis of a 24-week trial in participants with stage 2 or 3 fibrosis; the findings may not apply to other populations or longer-term outcomes.

Source

Published in Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Gastroenterology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.