Colitis cystica profunda: a systematic review.

Eur J Gastroenterol HepatolJan 29, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchGastroenterology

Thomas Stirrat, Deeptha Bejugam, Joseph Alukal et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This PRISMA 2020 systematic review synthesized 65 studies of histologically confirmed colitis cystica profunda (CCP), comprising 92 patients, to describe presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Rectal bleeding was the most common symptom (70%), and lesions were usually distal. Superficial biopsies reached the submucosa in only 32%, contributing to sampling error. Surgery was used in 67% of patients; dysplasia and coexisting invasive adenocarcinoma were reported in 10% and 4%, respectively. No subsequent malignant transformation was reported over a median follow-up of 8.4 months.

Key findings

  • Rectal bleeding was reported in 70% of patients; 61% of lesions were rectal.
  • Superficial biopsies reached the submucosa in only 32%, contributing to frequent sampling error.
  • Surgery was performed in 67% of patients; postoperative morbidity occurred in 5% and recurrence in 4%.
  • Dysplasia was reported in 10% and coexisting invasive adenocarcinoma in 4%; no subsequent malignant transformation was reported over a median follow-up of 8.4 months.

Why it matters

CCP can resemble colorectal malignancy, while superficial sampling may fail to establish the diagnosis. The review highlights the value of obtaining deeper tissue and using high-resolution imaging to characterize submucosal lesions. Its reported outcomes also underscore the importance of distinguishing CCP from cancer when considering the extent of intervention.

What to keep in mind

The evidence came from case reports and series, and median follow-up was 8.4 months; the findings therefore provide limited evidence about longer-term outcomes.

Source

Published in Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Gastroenterology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.